Backdated from previous BA website
Camden Council have officially withdrawn their planning application regarding the Tottenham Court Road needle exchange site today (14/02/2006), but we are neither celebrating, or will be complacent over this issue.
We are deeply suspicious about their intentions as past experience has shown that Camden Drugs Action Team are not beyond duplicity when it comes to acting on an agreed policy (West End Drugs Partnership) in relation to methods of needle exchange for injecting drug addicts.
In the DAT statement dated 14 Feb, they say: âThe proposed centre aimed to break the cycle of drug addiction, reduce crime and prevent the spread of viruses such as HIV and Hepatitis B and Câ. This is such a flippant and incredulous statement that it begs belief. To consider that this proposal would have achieved the above aims shows a lack of vision and poor strategic management.
There are at least 500 problematic addicts living in hostels concentrated south of Euston Road.
This critical mass concentration is the crux of the problem as it can not do other than stimulate the illegal drugs market, street crime and ASB.
This is possibly the largest concentration of hostels in such a restricted area catering specifically for drug addicts in any part of London.
Before Camden Council even consider adding to treatment services surely it makes sense to ensure that this existing core group of clients are supplied with clean needles from the place they live in, i.e. their place of residence.
We agree with the WEDP consensus of the âmixed economyâ policy; however this must NOT be implemented in any way that entrenches or assumes that the West End drug market is a permanent fixture. Camden Council / DAT repeatedly remind us that they must provide services âwhere the market isâ â the problem as we see it is that they created the market in the first place. Dispersal of the dynamics that stimulate the market is what is needed.
Bloomsbury Association 